Hebrews 1 – The Son in God’s Revelation & The Comeback of Chattel Slavery Founded by Obama

The article below was written in 2010 and the plan described has not taken place up to this time, and it may never happen, but then again it may.  Either way, this shows what goes through Obama’s mind.

Mark Twain (Samuel Clemens), 1835-1910, was not a big fan of politics, so I believe when he said the following he had the government in mind:

“Everybody talks about the weather, but nobody does anything about it.”

The politicians are the ones in power and it is their job to make sure everything is legal and proper.  Yet, they see what Obama and his cronies are doing, but do nothing. 

Our congress, senators, and congressman are no different than the jackal – they do nothing unless it’s a freebie and safe.  They don’t deserve to be in the position they are in and that is why yesterday we need to disengage from the United States government and rebuild a brand new government.

Obama thinks he’s the 4th best president the United States has ever had, hear it from his own lips.  What do you think?

Hebrews is the book of Faith, something that most of the world knows nothing about, especially not Washington D.C. 

In the last chapter of Titus I had told you that in Hebrews I would show you how evil our government is, so tomorrow we’ll look at what a…

Hebrews 1
The Son in God’s Revelation

1 God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets,

“God…spake” – God is the ultimate author of both the Old Testament and the New Testament.

“In time past” – prior to Christ’s coming, in contrast to “in these last days”, the Messianic era inaugurated by the incarnation.

2 Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds;

“Made the worlds” – we have no proof if God created other beings on different planets, but why would He only make us and all these universes?  So He must have made others.  And the scripture right here more or less says that He did.

And here’s a theory, I believe there are aliens, not that I have seen any, and these aliens are either fallen angels or people like us that have advanced to a higher degree then we have, like decades ago we never could have flown or gone to the moon.

That doesn’t mean they are dangerous, just curious, but it doesn’t mean they’re not either.

Also, I believe there is only one devil and he has a lot of area to cover.  He’s so evil he is not content with just corrupting Earth; he’s going to cover all of the universes.

3 Who being the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person, and upholding all things by the word of his power, when he had by himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high;

The superiority of the Son’s revelation is demonstrated by seven great descriptive statements about Him:

1. Appointed heir of all things (v. 2) – the incarnate Son, having performed the work of redemption, was gloriously exalted to the position of the firstborn heir of God, i.e., He received the inheritance of God’s estate (“all things”) (see Rom 8:17).

2. By whom also he made the worlds (v. 2) – see Jn 1:3; Col 1:16.

3. Brightness of His glory (v. 3) – as the brilliance of the sun is inseparable from the sun, so the Son’s radiance is inseparable from his deity, for He Himself is God, the second person of the Trinity (Jn 1:14, 18).

4. Express image of his person (v. 3) – Jesus is not merely an image or reflection of God.  Because the Son Himself is God, He is the absolutely authentic (14:9; Col 1:15).

5. Upholding all things (v. 3) – Christ is not like Atlas, the mythical Greek god who held the world on his shoulders.  The Son dynamically holds together and caries forward all that has been created through Him (Col 1:17).

6. Purged our sins” (v. 3) – through His redeeming death on the cross.

7. Sat down on the right hand on the Majesty on high” (v. 3) – being seated at God’s right hand indicates that the work of redemption is complete and that Christ is actively ruling with God as Lord over all (see v. 13, 8:1, 10:12, 12:2; Eph 1:20; Col 3:1; 1 Pet 3:22.

4 Being made so much better than the angels, as he hath by inheritance obtained a more excellent name than they.

“Much better than the angels” – to most Jews angels were exalted being, especially revered because they were involved in giving the law at Sinai and to the Jews the law was God’s supreme revelation.

The Dead Sea Scrolls reflect the supreme figure in the Messianic would be the supreme figure in the Messianic Kingdom.  Whether the recipients of Hebrews were tempted to assign angles a place above Christ (Messiah) is not known.

“Name” – to Jews a name stood for the full character of a person in all he was and did.  The section below that follows indicates that this name was “Son” – a name to which no angel could lay claim.

5 For unto which of the angels said he at any time, Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee? And again, I will be to him a Father, and he shall be to me a Son?

The Father never called anyone His Son, but Jesus.

6 And again, when he bringeth in the first begotten into the world, he saith, And let all the angels of God worship him.

“Let all the angels of God worship Him” – possibly quoted from Ps 97:7.  This statement, which in the Old Testament refers to the Lord God, is here applied to Christ, giving clear indication of His full deity.  The very being with whom Christ is being compared are commanded to proclaim His superiority by worshipping Him.

7 And of the angels he saith, Who maketh his angels spirits, and his ministers a flame of fire.

8 But unto the Son he saith, Thy throne, O God, is forever and ever: a scepter of righteousness is the scepter of thy kingdom.

9 Thou hast loved righteousness, and hated iniquity; therefore God, even thy God, hath anointed thee with the oil of gladness above thy fellows.

10 And, Thou, Lord, in the beginning hast laid the foundation of the earth; and the heavens are the works of thine hands:

11 They shall perish; but thou remainest; and they all shall wax old as doth a garment;

12 And as a vesture shalt thou fold them up, and they shall be changed: but thou art the same, and thy years shall not fail.

13 But to which of the angels said he at any time, Sit on my right hand, until I make thine enemies thy footstool?

14 Are they not all ministering spirits, sent forth to minister for them who shall be heirs of salvation?

“Ministering spirits” – Christ reigns; angles minister to hose sent to serve.

 The Comeback of Chattel Slavery
Founded by Obama

Story by Geraldine Winstanley,
a political writer

Hot off the presses:
Slavery is About to Stage a Return Engagement

This and the president’s repeated visits to Africa have helped him develop a sense of slavery’s rich contribution to the development of what he calls ‘this magical place the United States.’

Looking for a new way to appease the American Right and giving a provocative new twist to his definition of “sound, centrist policy,” Barack Obama is considering an executive order that would bring “the experimental reintroduction of slavery” to the United States.

Before we go any further let’s take a look at how the United States Constitution is looking:

At the time of this writing (3/7/14), Bush has basically removed/greatly damaged the 4th Amendment – “Searches and Seizures.”

Obama has already begun trying to remove the 1st Amendment – “Freedom of Speech”,

The 2nd Amendment – “Right to bear Arms”, and

According to this article, he wants to remove the 13th Amendment – “Abolishes slavery, and involuntary servitude.”

Housed in Alleys Behind K Street

According to a top administration aide in an exclusive and extensive interview, one program currently under consideration would be dubbed “Freedom in the Homeland.”

It would begin in two selected ghetto neighborhoods in predominantly black Washington D.C., the United States’ most unequal city.

Unemployed men and male high-school dropouts in those neighborhoods would be purchased by a joint public-private consortium and housed in alleys behind the city’s leading financial, insurance, and “defense” industry lobbying firms on K Street near the Capitol.

The program would fall under the wing of a little-known office in the Department of the Interior.

I’m going to say that the name “K Street” is fitting because there is a K Street in Tacoma, Washington, and what went on there during the 70s was anything but legal, from drugs to prostitution to extreme violence, you name, and it was there.

Unemployed men and male high-school dropouts would be purchased by a joint public-private consortium and housed in alleys behind the city’s leading on K Street near the Capitol.

The slaves would perform a broad number of tasks for senior members of those firms:

Shining shoes,
Washing cars,
Picking children up from day care,
Laundry,
Helping lobbyists’ older parents’ dress and clean themselves,
Growing vegetables and tending plants in lobbyists’ gardens,
Doing car maintenance,
Working in sweatshops owned by lobbyists,
and more.

In return, the young black inner-city males would receive food, clothing, and shelter along with what the top aide calls

A feeling of being at the real center of power in the world’s greatest Empire – priceless. It should move a bunch of them off that destructive, personally irresponsible inner-city culture that the president has been criticizing for years.

Knowing that Barack Obama stands behind this program will be useful for garnering cooperation from the young men selected for service to their country. It will help them see bondage as an opportunity for growth,” the administration official said.

What Are They Gonna Do, Elect Frederick Douglass?

While he is related (through his white mother Ann Durham) to the Southern slave Confederacy’s president Jefferson Davis, Obama is himself married to a black American descendant of slaves.

This and the president’s repeated visits to Africa have helped him develop a sense of slavery’s rich contribution to the development of what he calls “this magical place the United States.

Speaking on condition of anonymity, the official hastened to add that Obama’s “vision on this” remains “color-blind and post-racial.” The program might initially target inner-city blacks, but the White House’s program would “ultimately reach out in a spirit of inclusion to Latinos, Asians, and poor Caucasians.”

The extreme poverty of the city’s ghettoes (which “just happen to be 99 percent black”) and the lack of federal political representation for Washington D.C. are the main reasons for the initial site selection.

As one administration official joked during a recent West Wing meeting: “what are they going to do, elect Frederick Douglass to the U.S. Senate?”

Prospective Private and Public Partners

After a year of close “outcomes evaluation” by highly connected research firms experienced in assessing “welfare-to-work” and “workfare” programs that have been supported by Barack Obama in the past, the White House would work with various public and private-sector partners to expand the 21st century chattel-slavery program beyond the District of Columbia and across the nation.

A number of Obama’s top corporate and financial sponsors, including Boeing, General Dynamics, Exelon, Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, Wal-Mart, and Exxon-Mobil, have expressed interest in partnering with the White House on the “Freedom in the Homeland” program as it develops in coming years.

Already practicing essential elements of slavery at home and abroad, the Pentagon and the nation’s sprawling prison-industrial complex would likely come on board. So will immigration agencies, which interdict and detain a large number of stateless workers.

Not “Exactly Our First Big Orwellian Moment”

Anticipating political fallout from the potential irony of nation’s first black President reintroducing the widely hated system of chattel slavery (if only on “an incremental” scale), the Obama aide noted that “it wouldn’t exactly be our first mind-blowing ‘Orwellian’ moment, would it?”

In a candid comment, the White House official said:

“Look, let’s be clear. We ran on cleaning up Washington and came in here and cut one deal after another with big corporations, with concentrated wealth. Look at the Wall Street bailouts – we went well beyond Bush and Paulsen.

Look at how we did the bidding of the energy companies and sabotaged the Copenhagen climate talks. Look at the ‘health reform’ we just passed – it’s a corporatist joke, a giveaway to the insurance and drug companies with a few bones thrown to our so-called ‘progressive base.’

Remember how we said we’d broadcast the healthcare negotiations on C-Span? We were really going to do that while the President is cutting a behind-the-scenes deal with the insurance mafia to keep the public option (which we campaigned on) out of any final bill – sure.”

We can pretty much do what we want and call it ‘reasonable’ and ‘sound’ and ‘centrist’ and ‘pragmatic’ and to make anyone who opposes our program look like a carping crackpot and ‘extremist.’

We ran on ending the Bush ‘war on terror’ police state and we’ve totally sustained all that. We told a bunch of our ‘progressive’ voters we were basically antiwar and we’ve passed a record-setting Pentagon budget and we have if anything expanded militarism in South Asia and around the world. Ask the people – the survivors – in Bola Boluk. And what did Obama get? The Nobel freaking Peace Prize, just like Dr. King.

We ran against offshore oil drilling and look at what the president just called for in front of a fighter jet, yesterday — offshore oil drilling.

I could go on. Let’s face it, we can pretty much do what we want and call it ‘reasonable’ and ‘sound’ and ‘centrist’ and ‘pragmatic’ and to make anyone who opposes our program look like a carping crackpot and ‘extremist’ — an ‘ideologue.’ You guys in the media will find some way to spin it and make it sound ‘sensible’ for us.

You’ll make our critics look like whack-jobs. We’ll crack the whip and make ‘the Left’ play ball with us. Welcome to the U.S, political culture!

And remember, we intend to include all races in this program. It’s like the president said in 2004: he doesn’t wanted to represent ‘Black America’ or ‘White America.’ It’s about ‘the United States of America.’

What’s ‘the Big Deal’?‘”

The administration official added something else.

This is pretty unpleasant and most people don’t want to hear it,” he said, “but if there’s one thing this administration is about it is realism, okay? And here’s a harsh reality that ordinary hard-working people know about in the heart of hearts in this great country.

Most Americans already live under circumstances of de facto slavery – wage-slavery, salary-slavery, debt-slavery, mortgage-slavery, insurance-slavery, car-slavery and so on – as it is.

That’s a harsh fact. Let’s be clear about this: we’re all pretty much slaves to the corporate state anyway. I mean, that’s how we feel in the White House, for God’s sake.

Our price is pretty high and we live a lot better than most but we certainly know who are masters are, that’s for sure. We love it but we have no illusions.

So what’s the ‘big fucking deal,’ if I might quote Joe Biden? A lot people and especially ‘the Left’ are going to get a little crazy about this program for a while, but…they’ll get over it. They always do.

No Comment From “The Left”

Officials at MoveOn, the AFL-CIO, Change to Win/SEIU, LaRaza, the NAACP, the National Urban League, and other “liberal” and “progressive” organizations did not respond to this reporter’s query as to how they would feel about any moves towards the reintroduction of slavery in the U.S. on the part of the Obama administration.

The recent historical record suggests that they could be expected to make initial noises of complaint and then fall into supine acquiescence to “their” “progressive” and “liberal” President. An ACLU officer left a message “questioning the constitutionality” of the proposed program in light of the 13th and 14th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, passed in the wake of the Civil War.

He noted, however, that the current administration has, like its predecessors, showed a “clear propensity to disregard domestic and international law.” He also added that only a small number of Americans are aware of those amendments and their content.

“I’d hate to see slavery make a comeback,” the ACLU officer said, adding that “if anybody could put it back on the policy table, it’s Barack Obama.” The ACLU, the NAACP, and many other groups would certainly offer “serious legal challenges” to the “Freedom in the Homeland’ plan if and when it goes public.

…former Satanist explains the wickedness of the Washington D.C. Mall.